Recent happenings in Ashs series started a debate on moral issues. Stuart broad was clearly
out but refused to leave the field on a pretext that umpire did not indicate out. Stuart broad
stood his ground firmly knowing fully well that he is out. It is not understood which side
of the moral he is following i.e he has moral right to stand there as umpire did not give him
out rather than follow his moral instinct about right or wrong instill by his parents. To
complicate the matter Mr michel holding pointed out the incidence of " ramdin " banned
for a game for try to mislead umpire in his decision on moral ground. Incidently
match refree was Chris Broad. It can be said Chris Broad fails to instill moral values
to his son but passed judgement on moral ground to some other. It can be very well said
cricket is funny game with hyprocatic character like Chris Broad with a system( DRS) which
out but refused to leave the field on a pretext that umpire did not indicate out. Stuart broad
stood his ground firmly knowing fully well that he is out. It is not understood which side
of the moral he is following i.e he has moral right to stand there as umpire did not give him
out rather than follow his moral instinct about right or wrong instill by his parents. To
complicate the matter Mr michel holding pointed out the incidence of " ramdin " banned
for a game for try to mislead umpire in his decision on moral ground. Incidently
match refree was Chris Broad. It can be said Chris Broad fails to instill moral values
to his son but passed judgement on moral ground to some other. It can be very well said
cricket is funny game with hyprocatic character like Chris Broad with a system( DRS) which
helps undermine moral values received from parents.
